Example Policy/Principle Statements?
Jennifer Bell is the Executive Director of Visible Government. Check out their mission:
VisibleGovernment.ca is dedicated to promoting online tools for government transparency in Canada. VisibleGovernment.ca will champion the development of open source tools that allow citizens to share, organize, and analyze government data. By promoting the creation of these tools, VisibleGovernment.ca seeks to increase government accountability and engage citizens in the democratic process. The ultimate goal of VisibleGovernment.ca is to make Canada the world model for open governance.
The concept for VisibleGovernment.ca was inspired by the paper ‘Hack, Mash, and Peer: Crowd-sourcing Government Transparency ’ , by Jerry Brito of George Mason University, and by the example of the Sunlight Foundation in the US.
With her permission, her recent post to the ChangeCamp group is a guest post here. Thanks Jennifer! Jennifer’s cooperation here is a good example of how we would like to encourage non-partisan input.
Great thoughts & links on example policy & principal statement …
1. Really, my favorite, in terms of clarity and concision, are the Open Transition principles that Mark Kuznicki already mentioned: http://open-government.us/ 2. OpenGovData principles are a comprehensive defition of what open government data means: http://wiki.opengovdata.org/index.php/OpenDataPrinciples 3. The reccomendations from the US group OMBWatch's report: 'Moving Towards a 21st Century Right to Know Agenda' (the result of a long and well-funded research effort spanning a multitude of stakeholder groups and expert panels) has some good stuff in it, but it's a bit long and unevenly applicable. My favorite ideas are the creation of an 'Office of Open Government', and reccomendation D-9, quoted at length below. http://blog.sunlightfoundation.com/2008/11/17/the-right-to-know-agenda/ 4. While principles are nice, concrete examples of how a change will improve society are powerful too. The Illinois Data Exchange initiative has put together some nice ones that support their principles here: http://www.chidataexchange.net/usage_examples.htm 5. Norway's recent e-Citizen report, written by the 'Norweigen Ministry of Government Administration and Reform' is fairly revolutionary for something coming from a government agency, but it's a report, not a policy statement. Two key findings from the summary are: - core aspecs of public sector data should be made accessable and re- useable - e-government initiatives should participate with external developers, both locally and internationally. It's worth a look for a balanced section on positives and negatives of public participation in section 9. http://www.scribd.com/doc/8694619/eCitizen20The-Ordinary-Citizen-as-a-Supplier-of-Publicsector-Information (There are of course, other reports and reccomendations from different agencies/countries, but the Norway one is the most recent.) Jennifer


6. January 2009 um 03:28
The UK government runs competitions to see which public data transparency applications to fund:
http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/
They were convinced a few years ago that allowing government employees or contractors to do the job was a bad idea, that it would invariably lead to opacity on some important data, so they decided to fund outsiders, preferably volunteer-run organizations that would have no vested interest to protect.
A US example is the “Apps for Democracy” contest:
http://www.istrategylabs.com/government-20-the-rise-of-citizen-innovation-through-open-data/
In Canada, there’s now finally a Parliamentary Budget Office and at least a couple of political parties advocating public domain or share-alike data licensing, and free software or at least open source for applications funded by government. Also some best practice exchanges like the http://infraguide.ca though using primitive (PDF) technology.