<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Example Policy/Principle Statements?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redliberals.ca/2009/01/03/example-policyprinciple-statements%e2%80%8f/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redliberals.ca/2009/01/03/example-policyprinciple-statements%e2%80%8f/</link>
	<description>Red Liberal Web Log</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 00:41:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Hubley</title>
		<link>http://redliberals.ca/2009/01/03/example-policyprinciple-statements%e2%80%8f/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Hubley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redliberals.ca/?p=40#comment-2</guid>
		<description>The UK government runs competitions to see which public data transparency applications to fund:  
http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/

They were convinced a few years ago that allowing government employees or contractors to do the job was a bad idea, that it would invariably lead to opacity on some important data, so they decided to fund outsiders, preferably volunteer-run organizations that would have no vested interest to protect.

A US example is the &quot;Apps for Democracy&quot; contest:  
http://www.istrategylabs.com/government-20-the-rise-of-citizen-innovation-through-open-data/

In Canada, there&#039;s now finally a Parliamentary Budget Office and at least a couple of political parties advocating public domain or share-alike data licensing, and free software or at least open source for applications funded by government.   Also some best practice exchanges like the http://infraguide.ca though using primitive (PDF) technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK government runs competitions to see which public data transparency applications to fund:<br />
<a href="http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/" rel="nofollow">http://www.showusabetterway.co.uk/call/ideas/</a></p>
<p>They were convinced a few years ago that allowing government employees or contractors to do the job was a bad idea, that it would invariably lead to opacity on some important data, so they decided to fund outsiders, preferably volunteer-run organizations that would have no vested interest to protect.</p>
<p>A US example is the &#8220;Apps for Democracy&#8221; contest:<br />
<a href="http://www.istrategylabs.com/government-20-the-rise-of-citizen-innovation-through-open-data/" rel="nofollow">http://www.istrategylabs.com/government-20-the-rise-of-citizen-innovation-through-open-data/</a></p>
<p>In Canada, there&#8217;s now finally a Parliamentary Budget Office and at least a couple of political parties advocating public domain or share-alike data licensing, and free software or at least open source for applications funded by government.   Also some best practice exchanges like the <a href="http://infraguide.ca" rel="nofollow">http://infraguide.ca</a> though using primitive (PDF) technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
